Architecture-as-Code/ikt-arh-kultura-valodu-tehnologijas/docs/TRACEABILITY.md

TRACEABILITY — KISC Kultūras un valodu tehnoloģiju jomas mērķarhitektūra

This file maps the original human-readable source (PDF/presentation) sections to:

1. the SSOT registers in this repository, and
2. the regenerated machine-readable output (Markdown/PDF).

If any repo path in this table is missing or empty, the regenerated document is NOT considered equivalent.

---

Sources

• Source A: "MērķARH_Kultura_Valoda_V02_18.06.2025.pdf"
• Source B: "ARH_kulturas_valodu_jomu_PREZENT_V0.4_4.06.pdf"

---

Section mapping

Source section	Meaning (what must be preserved)	SSOT repo path(s)	Regenerated doc heading
1.1 Ievads	Purpose, context, why the document exists	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/intro.md (or generator inline section)	1.1 Ievads
1.2 Iesaistītās puses	Full list of institutions + roles	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/03-organizations/organizations.yaml + domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/domain.yaml	1.2 Iesaistītās puses
1.3 Saīsinājumi	Abbreviation list	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/abbreviations.yaml	1.3 Saīsinājumi
1.4 Saistītie dokumenti	List of strategies/laws/platforms and relevance	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/related-documents.yaml	1.4 Saistītie dokumenti
2. Esošās situācijas raksturojums	Current state summary	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/01-current-state/current-state.md (or equivalent)	2. Esošā situācija
3. Nākotnes redzējums	Target vision, objectives M1–M6	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/02-goals/goals.yaml	3. Nākotnes redzējums
4.1 Juridiskais skats	Legal/regulatory constraints grouped	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/legal-acts.yaml	4.1 Juridiskais skats
4.2 Biznesa skats	Functions, services	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/04-functions/ + domains/kultura-valoda/registers/05-services/	4.2 Biznesa skats
4.3 Semantiskais skats	Data/semantics principles, vocabularies	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/06-information-resources/ + domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/terms.yaml	4.3 Semantiskais skats
4.4.1 Lietojumprogrammu skats	Systems/applications	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/07-systems/	4.4.1 Lietojumprogrammu skats
4.4.2 Integrācija	Integration approach + dependencies	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/07-integrations/ (if exists) + domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/interactions.yaml	4.4.2 Integrācija
4.4.3 IKT infrastruktūra	Infrastructure approach	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/10-infrastructure/ (or equivalent)	4.4.3 IKT infrastruktūra
5.1 Pasākumu plāns	Roadmap actions with owners/deps/outputs	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/roadmap.yaml	5.1 Pasākumu plāns
5.2 Mijiedarbība ar citām jomām	Cross-domain interactions	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/interactions.yaml	5.2 Mijiedarbība ar citām jomām
5.3 Riski	Risk register with mitigation	domains/kultura-valoda/registers/09-risks/risks.yaml	5.3 Riski

---

Acceptance criteria (no-loss)

A regeneration is considered equivalent if ALL conditions hold:

1. All SSOT files listed above exist.
2. Registers that are YAML contain non-empty items: lists.
3. The regenerated document includes all headings listed in the table.
4. The regenerated document includes stakeholder organizations beyond only KM/KISC/LNB.
5. The regenerated document includes roadmap + risks (non-empty).

If any condition fails, treat regeneration as NOT equivalent and fix the registers or generator template.

✅ This file is deliberately strict and “traditional”: it behaves like a proper controlled-document trace matrix.