# TRACEABILITY — KISC Kultūras un valodu tehnoloģiju jomas mērķarhitektūra This file maps the original human-readable source (PDF/presentation) sections to: 1) the SSOT registers in this repository, and 2) the regenerated machine-readable output (Markdown/PDF). If any repo path in this table is missing or empty, the regenerated document is NOT considered equivalent. --- ## Sources - Source A: "MērķARH_Kultura_Valoda_V02_18.06.2025.pdf" - Source B: "ARH_kulturas_valodu_jomu_PREZENT_V0.4_4.06.pdf" --- ## Section mapping | Source section | Meaning (what must be preserved) | SSOT repo path(s) | Regenerated doc heading | |---|---|---|---| | 1.1 Ievads | Purpose, context, why the document exists | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/intro.md` (or generator inline section) | `1.1 Ievads` | | 1.2 Iesaistītās puses | Full list of institutions + roles | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/03-organizations/organizations.yaml` + `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/domain.yaml` | `1.2 Iesaistītās puses` | | 1.3 Saīsinājumi | Abbreviation list | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/abbreviations.yaml` | `1.3 Saīsinājumi` | | 1.4 Saistītie dokumenti | List of strategies/laws/platforms and relevance | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/related-documents.yaml` | `1.4 Saistītie dokumenti` | | 2. Esošās situācijas raksturojums | Current state summary | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/01-current-state/current-state.md` (or equivalent) | `2. Esošā situācija` | | 3. Nākotnes redzējums | Target vision, objectives M1–M6 | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/02-goals/goals.yaml` | `3. Nākotnes redzējums` | | 4.1 Juridiskais skats | Legal/regulatory constraints grouped | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/legal-acts.yaml` | `4.1 Juridiskais skats` | | 4.2 Biznesa skats | Functions, services | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/04-functions/` + `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/05-services/` | `4.2 Biznesa skats` | | 4.3 Semantiskais skats | Data/semantics principles, vocabularies | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/06-information-resources/` + `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/00-meta/terms.yaml` | `4.3 Semantiskais skats` | | 4.4.1 Lietojumprogrammu skats | Systems/applications | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/07-systems/` | `4.4.1 Lietojumprogrammu skats` | | 4.4.2 Integrācija | Integration approach + dependencies | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/07-integrations/` (if exists) + `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/interactions.yaml` | `4.4.2 Integrācija` | | 4.4.3 IKT infrastruktūra | Infrastructure approach | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/10-infrastructure/` (or equivalent) | `4.4.3 IKT infrastruktūra` | | 5.1 Pasākumu plāns | Roadmap actions with owners/deps/outputs | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/roadmap.yaml` | `5.1 Pasākumu plāns` | | 5.2 Mijiedarbība ar citām jomām | Cross-domain interactions | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/08-roadmap/interactions.yaml` | `5.2 Mijiedarbība ar citām jomām` | | 5.3 Riski | Risk register with mitigation | `domains/kultura-valoda/registers/09-risks/risks.yaml` | `5.3 Riski` | --- ## Acceptance criteria (no-loss) A regeneration is considered equivalent if ALL conditions hold: 1. All SSOT files listed above exist. 2. Registers that are YAML contain non-empty `items:` lists. 3. The regenerated document includes all headings listed in the table. 4. The regenerated document includes stakeholder organizations beyond only KM/KISC/LNB. 5. The regenerated document includes roadmap + risks (non-empty). If any condition fails, treat regeneration as NOT equivalent and fix the registers or generator template. ✅ This file is deliberately strict and “traditional”: it behaves like a proper controlled-document trace matrix.