3.9 KiB
lv.civdef.drone-threat-public-address
UAPF Level-4 process package — v0.2.0 (draft)
Conformant to UAPF specification v2.2.0 — see docs/04-validation-report.md.
Drone Threat Public Address & Citizen Notification — a process model of the cross-institutional algorithm for detecting a drone threat over Latvian airspace, deciding on and triggering public cell-broadcast notification, coordinating interception, and conducting field response and origin investigation.
Built from the public record of the 7 May 2026 Rēzekne drone incident and the
Ministry of Defence commitment to revise the inter-institutional notification
algorithms. Not approved for operational use (lifecycle.status: draft).
Layout
lv-civdef-drone-threat-public-address/
├── uapf.yaml # manifest (kind: uapf.package, level 4)
├── bpmn/
│ └── drone-threat-public-address.bpmn # end-to-end process flow
├── dmn/
│ └── air-threat-decisions.dmn # 3 decisions: severity / scope / interception
├── cmmn/
│ └── field-response-investigation.cmmn # field-response & origin-investigation case
├── resources/
│ ├── mappings.yaml # 11 targets, 19 bindings
│ └── guardrails.yaml # UAPF-IP guardrails policy snapshot
├── metadata/
│ ├── ownership.yaml
│ ├── lifecycle.yaml
│ └── policies.yaml # classification / execution / delegation
└── docs/ # non-normative supporting analysis
├── 00-incident-chronology.md
├── 01-institutional-gap-analysis.md
├── 02-raci.md
├── 03-uapf-ip-integration.md
└── 04-validation-report.md
Cornerstones
- BPMN
Process_DroneThreatPublicAddress— detection → threat assessment → gateway → broadcast-scope decision → request → parallel block {cell broadcast | agency notification | interception evaluation} → synchronise → local response → all-clear → field-response case → close. - DMN one DRD, three decisions —
Decision_AirThreatSeverity,Decision_CellBroadcastScope,Decision_InterceptionAuthorization. - CMMN
Case_DroneIncidentFieldResponse— debris search, fire suppression, scene security, an investigation stage (technical exam, origin attribution, disinformation monitoring), plus discretionary press and after-action review. - Resources 11 targets (NBS surveillance/Joint Staff/air-defence, VUGD duty and cell-broadcast system, State Police, KVC, Ministry of Defence, municipal commissions, an AI threat-assessment agent, an OSINT MCP tool) bound to every process / decision / case element via the v2.2.0 resource-mapping schema.
UAPF-IP & MCP
The manifest declares requires_capabilities, profiles_supported
(uapf-ip-orchestrated, uapf-ip-sync-decision), guardrails, and an
exposure.mcp block exposing the process and the three decisions as MCP tools.
See docs/03-uapf-ip-integration.md.
Validation
python3 ../../validate.py ../.. <path-to-UAPF-specification-repo>
Result: PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings against UAPF v2.2.0. The reference CLI
tools/uapf-cli/uapf.py will wrongly reject this package because it checks for
the obsolete .bpmn.xml extension — this is a known upstream bug, documented in
docs/04-validation-report.md.
Intended steward
Authored as an external draft (owner: Rihards Gailums). The intended institutional steward on hand-over is the Ministry of Defence (Aizsardzības ministrija) jointly with the Crisis Management Centre (Krīzes vadības centrs).
Sources
Public reporting only — LSM / eng.lsm.lv, Apollo, TV3, Meduza, Defense News,
The Globe and Mail, and the Wikipedia article "2026 Ukrainian drone incursions
into Baltic states". Dated record in docs/00-incident-chronology.md.